以城市更新为抓手,推动城市轨道交通高质量可持续发展

秦国栋

Promoting High-quality and Sustainable Development of Urban Rail Transit through Urban Renewal

QIN Guodong
  • 作者信息:
    中国城市发展规划设计咨询有限公司顾问总规划师
  • Affiliation:
    Chief Planning Advisor, China Urban Development Planning & Design Consulting Co., Ltd.
  • 栏目/Col:
    时评
时评 / Commentary
近20年,随着全国(不含港澳台,下同)城镇化的快速增长、城市的大规模增量扩张,城市轨道交通(以下简称“城轨”)运营里程高速增长。2005年到2024年,全国常住人口城镇化率由43%增长到67%,增长了24%;城轨运营里程由545 km增长到12 161 km,增长了约21倍。随着运营网络规模的急剧扩张,城轨高质量可持续发展面临着严峻挑战。一是客流强度低,网络扩张带来客流边际效益递减。2015年到2024年,城轨的运营里程增长了约236%,客流强度由1.21万人次/(km·d)下降到0.61万人次/(km·d),下降了49.6%。例如,广州地铁2015年线网规模为250 km左右时,全网客流强度达到2.6万人次/(km·d)左右,其后持续下降,到2024年约为1.51万人次/(km·d)。二是线路系统能力利用率较低,供给与需求匹配不佳。2023年,全国39个城市、195条大运能城区线统计数据表明:高峰小时高断面客流量大于等于3万人次/h的线路总计36条,仅占18.46%;高峰小时高断面客流量小于等于1万人次/h的线路70条,占35.90%;线路高峰小时运能利用率超过70%的线路占比15.9%,低于30%的线路占比40.51%。三是财务效益差,高质量可持续发展负担重。2023年,全国有数据的40个城市,票款收入覆盖基本运营成本比超过50%的有10个城市,占比25.64%;低于30%的有17个城市,占比43.59%。加上经营收益,全国仅有两个城市城轨的运营收入能够覆盖基本运营成本。东京地铁和我国香港、台北城轨的票务收入总体上能够全部覆盖运营成本。纽约地铁疫情前的2018年、2019年票务收入覆盖运营成本比分别为77%、80%,伦敦大致在60%~70%之间。四是站点周边集聚优势不突出,与城市功能融合不足。城轨站点周边平均集聚水平较低,大量站点周边存在低效、无效用地,特别是站点周边300 m核心吸引范围内的人口岗位密度过低,网络与功能空间匹配不佳。城市建设以汽车交通主导,拥车、用车文化盛行;站点周边缺乏精细化设计,站点周边行人、非机动车、机动车相互干扰,通行效率低,安全隐患突出,难以组织高品质的城市公共空间。中央城市工作会议指出,以推动城市高质量发展为主题,以坚持城市内涵式发展为主线,以推进城市更新为重要抓手,大力推动城市结构优化、动能转换、品质提升、绿色转型、文脉赓续、治理增效。城镇化正从快速增长期转向稳定发展期,城市发展正从大规模增量扩张阶段转向存量提质增效为主的阶段。城轨从引领城市增量扩张转向引领城市存量更新,是适应城市发展不同阶段需求的必然结果。城轨高质量可持续发展主要体现在客流效益和财务可持续。城轨的客流主要来源于站点周边的一定范围,站点周边地区人口岗位合理规模是增加客流,提高网络效能、票务收入,支撑城轨高质量可持续发展的根本前提。据东京都市圈的统计数据,在轨道交通出行中,东京都区部客运量占比49.7%,其次是近郊地区(核心都市及政令指定市、中心都市近郊)的站点周边主要影响范围内占45.1%,其他区域仅占5.2%。以城市更新为抓手,将有限的增量土地资源投放到城轨站点周边,将城市人口和岗位、城市功能向既有城轨站点周边集聚,提高城轨站点周边人口和岗位的集聚规模,是现阶段推动城轨高质量可持续发展的现实选择。同时,结合“轨道+社区”建设,构建城轨站点周边连续便捷、安全舒适的一体化衔接交通系统,高效地组织城市功能与居民出行,进一步提高城轨的竞争力和客流吸引力。在城市转入高质量发展的今天,城轨不仅作为一种高效的交通工具,更应成为引领城市更新与内涵式发展的重要力量。城市更新,是推动城轨高质量可持续发展的最后机会。

Over the past 20 years, with the rapid growth of urbanization nationwide (excluding Hong Kong, Macao, and Taiwan, same below) and the large-scale incremental expansion of cities, the operating mileage of urban rail transit (hereinafter referred to as ′urban rail′) has been growing at a high rate. From 2005 to 2024, the urbanization rate of permanent resident population in China increased from 43% to 67%, a growth of 24 percentage points; during the same period, urban rail operating mileage expanded from 545 km to 12,161 km, an increase of approximately 21 times. Along with the drastic expansion of operating network scale, urban rail now faces severe challenges in achieving high-quality and sustainable development.First, low passenger flow intensity: network expansion leads to diminishing marginal returns in terms of passenger flow intensity. Between 2015 and 2024, urban rail operating mileage increased by about 236%, while passenger intensity declined from 12 100 passengers/(km·day) to 6 100 passengers/(km·day), a decrease of 49.6%. For example, when the Guangzhou Metro network was about 250 km in 2015, the overall network passenger intensity reached about 26 000 passengers/(km·day). However, it has since continuously declined, dropping to about 15 100 passengers/(km·day) by 2024.Second, low utilization of line system capacity: the supply and demand mismatch. In 2023, statistics covering 39 cities and 195 high-capacity urban rail lines nationwide showed: only 36 lines (18.46%) had peak-hour maximum cross-section passenger flows greater than or equal to 30 000 passengers/hour; 70 lines (35.90%) had peak-hour maximum cross-section flows less than or equal to 10 000 passengers/hour. The share of lines with peak-hour capacity utilization above 70% was 15.9%, while 40.51% of lines had utilization below 30%.Third, poor financial performance: high-quality and sustainable development affords heavy burden. In 2023, among 40 cities with available data, only 10 cities (25.64%) had fare revenue covering more than 50% of their basic operating costs, while 17 cities (43.59%) had coverage ratios below 30%. Even when including ancillary business revenues, only two cities in China had urban rail operating income sufficient to cover basic operating costs. By comparison, fare revenues for Tokyo Metro as well as urban rail systems in Hong Kong and Taipei generally cover operating costs in full. In New York City, fare revenues covered 77% and 80% of operating costs in 2018 and 2019 (pre-pandemic), respectively. In London, the figure is generally between 60% and 70%.Fourth, insufficient agglomeration advantages around stations: the integration with urban functions is inadequate. The average level of agglomeration around urban rail stations is relatively low, with many stations surrounded by inefficient or even ineffective land use. Especially within the 300-meter core attraction radius of many stations, the density of both population and employment is far too low, leading to poor alignment between the network and functional urban space. Urban development has long been dominated by automobile traffic, with car ownership and usage culture prevailing. The areas around stations often lack refined design; pedestrians, non-motorized vehicles, and motor vehicles interfere with one another, resulting in low circulation efficiency, prominent safety hazards, and difficulties in organizing high-quality urban public space.The Central Urban Work Conference emphasized that promoting high-quality urban development should be the overarching theme, with connotative urban development as the main trajectory, and urban renewal as a key approach. Efforts must be made to advance urban structural optimization, encourage transformation of growth drivers, enhance urban quality, promote green transition, carry forward cultural continuity, and improve governance efficiency. Urbanization in China is shifting from a phase of rapid growth to one of stable development, while urban development is moving from large-scale incremental expansion to a stage primarily focused on enhancing and optimizing existing stock. Correspondingly, the role of urban rail is evolving from leading incremental urban expansion to driving urban stock renewal—an inevitable outcome of meeting the needs of different stages of urban development.High-quality and sustainable development of urban rail is reflected primarily in passenger flow benefits and financial sustainability. Urban rail ridership mainly originates from areas within a certain radius around stations. A reasonable scale of population and employment density in station catchment areas is the fundamental prerequisite for increasing passenger flow, improving network efficiency, boosting fare revenues, and supporting the high-quality and sustainable development of urban rail. According to statistics from the Tokyo metropolitan region, among all rail transit trips, 49.7% originate within the Tokyo metropolitan area, 45.1% from station catchment areas in surrounding suburban regions (core metropolitan areas and designated major cities, as well as near-core suburban areas), while only 5.2% come from other areas.Taking urban renewal as the lever, allocating limited incremental land resources around urban rail stations, and guiding the concentration of urban population, employment, and functions toward existing station areas can increase the scale of population and employment agglomeration around stations. This is a practical choice at the present stage for promoting high-quality and sustainable urban rail development. At the same time, by integrating ′Rail+Community′ development, it is possible to build continuous, convenient, safe, and comfortable integrated transport systems around stations, effectively coordinating urban functions with residents′ travel, thereby further enhancing the competitiveness and passenger appeal of urban rail.In today′s era of high-quality urban development, urban rail should not only serve as an efficient means of transportation, but also as a vital force in leading urban renewal and connotative development. Urban renewal represents the last opportunity to drive the high-quality and sustainable development of urban rail.

Translated by ZHANG Liman

  • 上一篇: -
  • 下一篇: -
论文检索