车下设备包覆情况对城际铁路列车气动性能的影响

Impact of Undercarriage Equipment Enclosure Conditions on the Aerodynamic Performance of Intercity Railway Trains

  • 摘要:
    目的 车下设备的包覆情况直接影响列车的气动外形,进而影响整车的气动性能,因此有必要开展车下设备的包覆情况对列车气动性能的影响研究。
    方法 以某型城际铁路列车为基础模型,阐述了气动试验的风洞及设备,设计了2个验证模型方案:有设备舱包覆的车下方案1、无设备舱包覆的车下方案2。对2个车下方案开展了气动力测量试验和气动噪声测量试验,气动力试验分析分别从气动阻力、头车升力及尾车升力、侧风稳定性3个方面展开,气动噪声试验则比较分析了远场气动噪声的差异。
    结果及结论 轨道车辆车下设备直接外露会导致整车阻力、尾车升力均明显增大,其中,无侧风工况下,整车阻力增大了17.4%;侧风工况下,因地面附面层的影响,与侧风稳定性相关的气动升力和侧向力变化不敏感。在气动噪声方面,车下设备外露对来流的阻滞效果明显,降低了车下气流速度,减小了气流对转向架的直接冲击及该区域的湍流强度,致使声源强度降低。在2个试验速度等级下,远场平均气动噪声降低了0.8~1.0 dB(A)。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective The enclosure condition of undercarriage equipment directly affects the aerodynamic shape of the train, which in turn affects the aerodynamic performance of the whole train. Therefore, it is necessary to carry out a research on the impact of the enclosure condition of undercarriage equipment on the train aerodynamic performance.
    Method Taking a certain type of intercity railway train as the baseline model, the wind tunnel and equipment used for aerodynamic testing are elaborated. Two verification model schemes are designed: undercarriage scheme 1 with equipment bay enclosure, and undercarriage scheme 2 without equipment bay enclosure. Aerodynamic force and noise measurement tests are carried out for both schemes. The aerodynamic force test analysis is conducted from three aspects: aerodynamic drag, leading car lift and tail car lift, and crosswind stability; while the aerodynamic noise test comparatively analyzes the differences in far-field aerodynamic noise.
    Result & Conclusion  The direct exposure of undercarriage equipment on rail vehicles leads to a significant increase in both overall train drag and tail car lift. Among them, under crosswind-free conditions, the overall train drag increases by 17.4%. Under crosswind conditions, due to the influence of the ground boundary layer, the changes in aerodynamic lift and side force related to crosswind stability are not sensitive. In terms of aerodynamic noise, the exposure of undercarriage equipment has a significant stagnation effect on the incoming flow, reducing the airflow velocity under the train, decreasing the direct impact of the airflow on the bogies and the turbulence intensity in this region, thus resulting in a reduction of sound source intensity. At the two tested speed levels, the average far-field aerodynamic noise decreases by 0.8~1.0 dB(A).

     

/

返回文章
返回