城市轨道交通车辆变流器集成化质量特性测试方法研究

Research on Integrated Mass Characteristics Testing Method for Urban Rail Transit Vehicle Converters

  • 摘要:
    目的 列车上设备的质量特性参数是城市轨道交通车辆质量评估的关键要素,直接影响着列车的整体性能和行车安全。变流器作为城市轨道交通车辆电气牵引传动系统的核心部件,其结构具有体积大、结构复杂、安装方式特定化等特点,传统的质量特性测试方法已不再适用,需要研究新的测试方法。
    方法 参考航天器质量特性测试的成熟技术标准QJ 2258A—2001,以我国某城市轨道交通车辆车下设备变流器为试件,根据该变流器的结构设计了工装。采用集成化测试设备,通过三坐标转换装置对变流器进行了姿态调整,并采用多次测量取平均值的方法,测得相应的质量特性参数。为保证测试的可靠性,在测试前对工装进行了有限元建模和静应力分析,并将实测值与计算值进行了对比分析。
    结果及结论  变流器的设计工装可以满足静强度要求。变流器的质心、转动惯量参数的实测值与计算值很接近,二者的最大偏差仅为2.5%。所提的测试方法可行、有效。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective The mass characteristic parameters of the on-board equipment are key elements for the quality evaluation of urban rail transit vehicles, directly affecting the overall performance and running safety of the train. As a core component of urban rain transit vehicle’s electrical traction drive system, the converter is characterized by large volume, complex structure, and specialized installation methods. Therefore, traditional mass characteristics measurement methods are no longer applicable, necessitating research on new measurement methods.
    Method Referring to QJ 2258A—2001, a mature technical standard for spacecraft mass characteristic testing, an undercarriage equipment converter of urban rail transit vehicle in a Chinese city is taken as the test specimen, the tooling is designed according to the structure of the converter. Using integrated testing equipment, the attitude of the converter is adjusted via a 3-axis coordinate transformation device, and the corresponding mass characteristic parameters are obtained by the method of taking the arithmetic mean of multiple measurements. To ensure reliability, finite element modeling and static stress analysis are performed on the tooling before testing, and the measured values are compared with the calculated values.
    Result & Conclusion  The designed tooling for the converter can meet the static strength requirements; the measured values of the converter's CoM (center of mass) and rotational inertia parameters are very close to the calculated values, with a maximum deviation between the two being only 2.5%. Therefore, the proposed testing method is feasible and effective.

     

/

返回文章
返回