滨海软土吹填造陆区地铁车站围护结构方案研究

Research on Enclosure Structure Schemes for Metro Stations in Coastal Soft Soil Reclamation Areas

  • 摘要:
    目的 在沿海发达地区,在吹填造陆区建设轨道交通工程的情况越来越多。若在吹填完成后施工地铁车站围护结构,则不仅要面临深厚软土地层的不利影响,还存在工期长的问题。若与吹填工程同步施工地铁车站围护结构,则须考虑支挡吹填泥沙及海水。为保证基坑施工安全,有必要研究吹填造陆区地铁车站围护结构方案。
    方法 针对吹填工程完成后施工围护结构方案,以及吹填工程与地铁车站围护结构同时施工方案,在建设工期、施工风险、用地、防洪排涝、资源利用及工程投资等多方面进行综合比较。针对不同围护形式,模拟计算了吹填过程中围堰的位移及安全系数,进而确定车站围护结构的安全性。通过施工现场监测数据来验证地铁车站围护结构的安全性与可实施性。
    结果及结论 经比选,吹填工程与地铁车站围护结构同时施工方案中的围堰+钻孔桩围护形式最佳,可实现吹填工程与地铁车站同时施工,工程风险小,施工高效便捷,工程投资经济合理。模拟计算及现场监测结果表明,围堰+钻孔桩围护结构安全可靠,其仅使用常规工程材料,工程可实施性强。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective In coastal developed regions, the construction of rail transit projects in reclaimed land areas is becoming increasingly common. If the enclosure structure of a metro station is constructed after land reclamation, the construction will not only be subject to the adverse effects of deep soft soil layers, but also face the prolonged construction period issue. If the above structure is constructed concurrently with the land reclamation project, it must be taken into account to retain the reclaimed sediment and seawater. To ensure the safety of foundation pit construction, it is necessary to study enclosure structure schemes for metro stations in reclaimed land areas.
    Method  A comprehensive comparison in terms of construction duration, construction risks, land use, flood control/drainage, resource utilization, and engineering investment, is conducted between the scheme of constructing the enclosure structure after land reclamation, and that of the concurrent enclosure structure construction with the land reclamation project. For different enclosure forms, the displacement and safety factors of the cofferdam during the reclamation process are simulated and calculated to determine the safety of the station enclosure structure. The safety and feasibility of the metro station enclosure structure are verified through on-site construction monitoring data.
    Result & Conclusion  After comparison, the cofferdam plus bored pile retaining structure in the above-mentioned concurrent construction scheme is found to be optimal. This scheme enables concurrent construction of the land reclamation project and the metro station, featuring low engineering risks, high efficiency and convenience, and reasonable engineering investment. Simulation calculations and on-site monitoring results indicate that the cofferdam plus bored pile retaining structure is safe and reliable. As it utilizes only conventional engineering materials, the structure demonstrates strong engineering feasibility.

     

/

返回文章
返回