厦门地铁车站结构底板处孔隙水压力分布规律

Distribution Laws of Pore Water Pressure at the Bottom Slab of Xiamen Metro Station Structures

  • 摘要:
    目的 地铁车站结构的抗浮稳定性是城市轨道交通建设过程中的关键技术问题之一,因此需对地铁车站结构底板处的孔隙水压力分布规律进行研究。
    方法 以厦门地铁某车站工程为例,采用现场监测和室内模型试验的方法,研究不同地层条件下,车站结构底板处的孔隙水压力分布及其变化规律。
    结果及结论 地铁车站结构底板下方土体孔隙水压力的变化过程可划分为4个典型阶段:零点附近波动、小幅增长、逐步上升以及随地面水位波动。当有围护结构时,车站底板中心位置的孔隙水压力最大,两侧较小;当无围护结构时,车站结构底板中心位置孔隙水压力最小,两侧较大。典型花岗岩地层中,地铁车站结构所受浮力小于静水压力。其中,残积砂质黏性土、全风化花岗岩、强风化花岗岩及中风化花岗岩地层对应的孔隙水压力折减系数分别约为 0.75~0.87、0.84~0.94、0.87~0.90 和 0.82~0.87。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective The anti-floating stability of metro station structures is one of the key technical issues in the construction of urban rail transit. Therefore, it is necessary to study the distribution characteristics of pore water pressure at the bottom slab of metro station structures (abbreviated as “structure bottom pore water pressure”).
    Method Taking a certain metro station project in Xiamen City as an example, field monitoring and laboratory model tests are employed to study the distribution and variation laws of structure bottom pore water pressure under different strata conditions.
    Result & Conclusion  The variation process of pore water pressure in the soil below the bottom slab of metro stations can be divided into four typical stages: fluctuation near zero, slight growth, gradual rise, and fluctuation with the ground water level. When with a retaining structure, the pore water pressure is maximum at the center of the station bottom slab, while smaller on the both sides; when without a retaining structure, it is minimum at the center of the station structure bottom slab and larger on the both sides. In typical granite strata, the buoyancy force acting on the metro station structure is less than the hydrostatic pressure. Specifically, the pore water pressure reduction coefficients for residual sandy cohesive soil, completely weathered granite, strongly weathered granite, and moderately weathered granite strata are approximately 0.75~0.87, 0.84~0.94, 0.87~0.90, and 0.82~0.87, respectively.

     

/

返回文章
返回