基于事故通风要求的地铁区间隧道联络通道防火门拆修方案

Dismantling and Repair Scheme for Fire Doors in Metro Interval Tunnel Cross Passages Based on Emergency Ventilation Requirements

  • 摘要:
    目的 地铁区间隧道内联络通道防火门因损坏或脱落须拆修时,一般更换周期约为2~3月。拆修期间会造成线路左线和右线气流联通,进而影响区间事故通风效果,导致原隧道通风模式可能无法满足规范要求。有必要对拆修期间基于事故通风要求的地铁区间隧道联络通道防火门拆修方案进行研究。
    方法 以武汉某地铁长大区间为研究案例,简要阐述了区间概况。介绍了地铁区间的通风排烟标准及案例区间的通风方案,并借助SES(地铁环境模拟)软件建立了数值计算模型,确定了案例区间内各通风区段的最不利火灾工况。结合案例区间内3个通风区段的模拟结果,详细分析了不同拆修方案在最不利火灾工况下的断面排烟风速是否满足规范要求,提出了各通风区段合理的联络通道防火门拆修方案。
    结果及结论  建议联络通道防火门按通风区段进行分组拆修。对于联络通道数量不大于3处的通风区段,可采用原隧道通风控制方案,其中:联络通道数量为2处时应逐个拆修;联络通道数量为3处时,同时拆修的防火门不应大于2处。对于联络通道数量为4处的通风区段,原隧道通风控制方案无法满足区间的通风排烟要求,须加开隧道风机以辅助通风排烟,具体通风控制方案应经模拟计算确定。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective When cross passage fire doors in metro interval tunnels need to be dismantled and repaired due to damage or detachment, the replacement cycle is generally about 2 to 3 months. During the dismantling and repair period, airflow between the left and right tunnels becomes interconnected, which in turn affects the ventilation performance for accidents in interval, and the original tunnel ventilation mode may fail to meet specification requirements. Therefore, it is necessary to study dismantling and repair schemes for cross passage fire doors in metro interval tunnels based on emergency ventilation requirements.
    Method Taking a long-large interval of a metro line in Wuhan as the study case, the general conditions are briefly described. The ventilation and smoke exhaust standards for metro intervals and the ventilation scheme of the case interval are introduced. A numerical calculation model is established using SES (subway environment simulation) software to determine the most unfavorable fire scenarios in each ventilation section of the case interval. Based on the simulation results of three ventilation sections in case interval, a detailed analysis is conducted to assess whether the cross-sectional smoke exhaust air velocity in different dismantling and repair schemes meets specification requirements under the most unfavorable fire conditions. Reasonable dismantling and repair schemes for cross passage fire doors in each ventilation section are proposed.
    Result & Conclusion  It is recommended that cross passage fire doors be dismantled and repaired in groups according to ventilation sections. For ventilation sections with three or less cross passages, the original tunnel ventilation control scheme can be adopted. When there are two cross passages, dismantling and repair works should be carried out one by one; in case of three cross passages, no more than two fire doors should be dismantled and repaired simultaneously. For ventilation sections with four cross passages, since the original tunnel ventilation control scheme cannot meet the ventilation and smoke exhaust requirements, the tunnel fans need to be additionally activated to assist ventilation and smoke exhaust. The specific ventilation control scheme should be determined through simulation calculations.

     

/

返回文章
返回