城市轨道交通盾构隧道开挖面泥水压力计算理论工程比选分析

Comparative Analysis of Calculation Theories for Slurry Pressure at Urban Rail Transit Shield Tunnel Excavation Faces

  • 摘要:
    目的 当前,泥水压力计算理论的研究较为分散,既有研究往往侧重于某一特定计算理论的应用,或仅针对某一类地质条件进行分析,缺乏系统性的比较和总结。因此,有必要对盾构隧道开挖面泥水压力计算理论进行系统的工程比选分析。
    方法 提出了盾构隧道开挖面泥水压力计算理论;针对不同理论在不同地层条件下的适用性问题,对多条不同地层条件下的盾构隧道进行了数据采集,并对掘进过程中的泥水压力值进行了现场监测。考虑人工计算盾构隧道全线开挖面泥水压力的复杂性和低效性,开发了可快速计算上述理论值的MATLAB程序,并将所得泥水压力实测值与计算理论值进行了对比分析。同时,采用FLAC3D有限差分软件建立了不同工况下的数值模型,通过模拟分析明确了所提计算理论的适用性。最后,结合盾构隧道穿越地层的渗透系数,得出了水土分算与水土合算的地层渗透性划分区间。
    结果及结论 针对浅埋工况下的砂土、砾石地层,建议采用朗肯主动土压力计算理论。针对浅埋工况下的黏土地层,建议采用基于全土柱理论的三维楔形体计算理论。针对深埋工况下的砂土地层,建议采用太沙基松动土压力计算理论。针对深埋工况下的黏土地层,建议采用基于太沙基松动土压力的三维楔形体计算理论。针对渗透系数大于1×10−3 cm/s的砂土地层,建议采用水土分算;针对渗透系数小于6×10−6 cm/s的黏土地层,建议采用水土合算。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective Current researches on slurry pressure calculation theories are fragmented, mainly focusing on the application of a single specific calculation theory or analyzing only one type of geological condition, without systematic comparison and summary. Accordingly, it is necessary to conduct a systematic engineering comparative analysis of calculation theories for the slurry pressure at shield tunnel excavation faces.
    Method A calculation theory for the above-mentioned slurry pressure is proposed. To investigate the adaptability of different theories under various stratum conditions, field data are collected from multiple shield tunnels that traverse differing strata, and on-site monitoring of slurry pressure values during tunnelling is carried out. Given the complexity and low efficiency of manually calculating full-line excavation face slurry pressure for shield tunnels, a MATLAB program is developed to rapidly compute the theoretical values derived from the proposed theory. Measured slurry pressure values are then comparatively analyzed against the theoretical calculated values. Meanwhile, numerical models for diverse working conditions are established using the finite difference software FLAC3D, and the adaptability of the proposed calculation theory is verified through simulation analysis. Finally, division intervals of stratum permeability for water-soil separated pressure calculation and water-soil combined pressure calculation are obtained in combination with the permeability coefficients of the strata shield tunnels traverse.
    Result & Conclusion  For the sandy and gravel strata under shallow-buried conditions, the Rankine active earth pressure calculation theory is recommended. For the clay strata under shallow-buried conditions, a three-dimensional wedge mode calculation theory based on the full-soil column theory is suggested. For the sandy strata under deep-buried conditions, Terzaghi's loosening earth pressure calculation theory is preferred, and for the clay strata in same conditions, a three-dimensional wedge mode calculation theory built upon the above Terzaghi's calculation is advised. Water-soil separated pressure calculation is recommended for sandy strata with a permeability coefficient greater than 1×10−3 cm/s, whereas water-soil combined pressure calculation is preferred for clay strata with a permeability coefficient lower than 6×10−6 cm/s.

     

/

返回文章
返回