磁浮列车永磁电磁混合悬浮与电磁悬浮磁力特性对比研究

Comparative Study on Magnetic Force Characteristics of Permanent Magnet Electromagnetic Hybrid Suspension and Electromagnetic Suspension for Maglev Trains

  • 摘要:
    目的 电磁悬浮列车运行时,电磁铁通电电流较大,能耗高且发热现象严重,永磁电磁混合悬浮技术有望解决电磁悬浮技术的能耗和发热问题。因此,有必要对这两种磁浮制式的磁力特性进行对比研究,明确混合悬浮系统在悬浮力、导向力等方面的特性表现。
    方法 基于混合悬浮与电磁悬浮原理,推导出电磁场理论模型并建立了非线性有限元仿真模型。在不同悬浮间隙及励磁电流工况下,研究了两种磁浮制式的悬浮力变化情况;在磁浮列车车辆产生不同横向偏移时,研究了两种磁浮制式的导向力变化情况。最后,详细分析了两种磁浮制式在悬浮力特性、导向力特性及稳定性控制方面的表现差异。
    结果及结论 额定悬浮质量相同的情况下,混合悬浮所需励磁电流明显低于电磁悬浮,系统能耗和发热现象可得到有效控制。虽然混合悬浮的悬浮力具有更小的负刚度,悬浮间隙变化时悬浮力变化较为平缓,但悬浮力的电流敏感度更低,不利于悬浮系统的稳定控制。列车低速运行时,两种磁浮制式的悬浮稳定性差别不大;但随着列车运行速度的提升,电磁悬浮系统表现出更好的悬浮稳定性。混合悬浮与电磁悬浮的导向力特性基本一致,导向力随车辆横向偏移的增加而增大,导向刚度则因系统漏磁而逐渐降低。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective During the operation of EMS (electromagnetic suspension) maglev trains, the electromagnets carry large energizing currents, leading to high energy consumption and severe heat generation. The permanent magnet - electromagnetic hybrid suspension technology is expected to address such problems. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct a comparative study on the magnetic force characteristics of the above two maglev modes to clarify the performance of the hybrid suspension system in terms of levitation force, guidance force, and other aspects.
    Method Based on the principles of hybrid suspension and EMS, the theoretical model of the electromagnetic field is derived, and a nonlinear finite-element simulation model is established. Under different suspension gaps and excitation currents, the variations of suspension force in the two maglev modes are investigated. When the maglev vehicle undergoes different lateral displacements, the variations of guidance force in the two modes are studied. Finally, the performance differences in the characteristics of suspension force and guidance force, and stability control between the two modes are analyzed in detail.
    Result & Conclusion  Under the same rated suspension mass, the required excitation current of hybrid suspension is significantly lower than that of EMS, which enables effective control of system energy consumption and heating. The suspension force of hybrid suspension mode exhibits smaller negative stiffness, and varies more gently with the suspension gap change. However, its lower current sensitivity is unfavorable for stable control of the levitation system. There is little difference in the suspension stability between the two modes at lower train speed. With the increase of the train speed, the EMS system demonstrates better suspension stability. The guidance force characteristics of both hybrid suspension and EMS are basically consistent. The guidance force rises with the increase of the vehicle lateral displacement, while the guidance stiffness gradually decreases due to magnetic flux leakage of the system.

     

/

返回文章
返回