基于运行图调整的城市轨道交通重联列车故障救援方案选择

Selection of Rescue Schemes for Failed Coupled Urban Rail Transit Trains Based on Timetable Adjustment

  • 摘要:
    目的 在重联编组模式下不同编组列车混行,若有列车发生故障,则无法完全沿用单编组模式救援方案。为确保线路服务质量,有必要及时调整运行图并选择合理的列车救援方案。
    方法 针对重联编组模式下列车故障救援可能出现的动力不足、后车延误等问题,划分重联列车故障场景。提出采取取消车次、小交路折返及开行备用车等措施形成救援方案,及时恢复正线列车的正常运行。以与原时刻表偏差和列车取消服务车站数最小为目标,构建混合整数线性优化模型。以某地铁线路为例,分析列车在线路不同位置出现故障时不同救援方案的适用性。
    结果及结论 当列车在线路中段发生故障时,后车联挂正向救援方案产生的冲突进路较少,故障区段两端列车调整更灵活。当列车在线路一端发生故障时,故障列车解体正向救援方案作业时间更快,对后车的影响较小。采用小交路折返措施能减少运行调整中加开的备用车数量。同一救援方案下,与列车未提前折返相比,采用小交路提前折返措施后目标函数值减小64.3%。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective In mixed-formation coupled operation, if a train fails, rescue schemes designed for single-formation modes cannot be fully applied. To ensure line service quality, it is necessary to timely adjust train timetables and select reasonable train rescue schemes.
    Method To address issues such as insufficient power and subsequent train delays that may occur during train failure rescue under the coupled operation mode, failure scenarios for coupled trains are classified. Rescue schemes incorporating measures such as trip cancellation, short-turn reversal, and standby train deployment are proposed to timely restore normal train operations on the mainline. A mixed-integer linear programming model is established, targeting the minimization of deviation from the original timetable and the number of canceled station services. Taking a metro line as an example, the applicability of different rescue schemes for train failures occuring at various locations along the line is analyzed.
    Result & Conclusion When a train failure occurs in the middle section of the line, the forward rescue scheme with rear-train coupling generates fewer conflicting routes, allowing more flexible train adjustments at both ends of the faulty section. When a train fails at either end of the line, the forward rescue scheme with faulty train decoupling offers faster operation time and exerts less impact on subsequent trains. Implementing short-turn reversal measures can reduce the number of additional standby trains deployed during operational adjustments. Under the same rescue scheme, compared with scenarios without advance reversal, adopting short-turn advance reversal measures reduces the objective function value by 64.3%.

     

/

返回文章
返回