城市轨道交通全自动运行系统RAM指标分析及应用

Analysis and Application of Fully Automatic Operation System RAM Indicators in Urban Rail Transit

  • 摘要:
    目的 FAO(全自动运行)系统中线路运营指标与各核心设备系统RAM(可靠性、可用性、可维护性)指标之间缺乏系统性关联分析,对此,有必要构建1套从运营指标逐级映射至部件级RAM指标的分析体系。
    方法 首先,从FAO系统运营指标出发,分析线路运营指标与产品RAM指标之间的内在联系,构建“FAO系统—核心系统—子系统—单元—部件”逐层映射的RAM指标分析框架。其次,明确线路运营指标的分类,将其设定为线路总体服务表现指标与单一系统可靠性指标两大类。再次,以青岛地铁6号线为例,基于线路运营数据将运营指标换算为年允许故障事件数,并参考故障占比数据,将线路运营指标中的列车服务可靠度、列车退出正线运行故障率、列车退出FAO模式故障率、列车唤醒成功率分解至列车控制、车辆、站台门等专业核心系统。在此基础上,建立各核心设备系统的可靠性模型,采用综合因子法进行RAM指标分配,并运用FTA(故障树分析)方法对FAO整体运营指标开展验证分析。最后,通过对比分配的RAM指标与FTA分析结果,验证了所构建指标体系的合理性。
    结果及结论 研究结果表明,通过运营指标分配得到的各核心系统MTBF(平均故障间隔时间)指标,能够满足基于FTA方法计算所得的顶事件频率要求,实现了从线路运营指标到设备系统RAM指标的分解映射,并完成了运营指标与设备系统指标的一致性验证。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective Systematic correlation analysis between line operation indicators and RAM (reliability, availability, maintainability) indicators of each core equipment system in the FAO (fully automatic operation) system is insufficient. In view of this, it is necessary to develop an analytical framework that progressively maps FAO line operation indicators down to component-level RAM indicators.
    Method Firstly, starting from the operation indicators of the FAO system, the intrinsic relationships between line operation indicators and product RAM indicators are analyzed, and a hierarchical RAM indicator analysis framework is constructed with a mapping chain of FAO system → core systems → subsystems → units → components. Secondly, the line operation indicators are clearly classified into two main categories, i.e. overall line service performance indicators and reliability indicators of single-system. Thirdly, taking Qingdao Metro Line 6 as the research object, the operation indicators are converted into allowable annual fault event counts based on line operation data. With reference to the fault proportion data, key operation indicators, including train service reliability, failure rate of train withdrawing from mainline operation, failure rate of train exiting FAO mode, and train wake-up success rate, are decomposed into specialized core systems such as train control, rolling stock, and platform screen doors. On this basis, reliability models for each core equipment system are established, RAM indicator is allocated using the comprehensive factor method, and FTA (fault tree analysis) is adopted to analyze and verify the overall FAO operation indicators. Finally, the rationality of the established indicator system is validated by comparing the allocated RAM indicators with the FTA analysis results.
    Result & Conclusion  The results show that the MTBF (mean time between failures) indicators for each core system, obtained through the allocation of operation indicators, can satisfy the top event frequency requirements calculated via the FTA method. The decomposition and mapping from line operation indicators to equipment-system RAM indicators are achieved, and the consistency verification between operation indicators and equipment-system indicators is completed.

     

/

返回文章
返回