高水压高速铁路盾构隧道管片泄水孔设置方案及优化分析

Setting Scheme and Optimization Analysis of Drainage Holes in High-Speed Railway Shield Tunnel Segments under High Water Pressure

  • 摘要:
    目的 高水压高速铁路盾构隧道中,管片结构需要承受较高的外部荷载。为降低管片承载,可以设置泄水孔进行排水减压。合理的泄水孔位置有利于最大限度降低管片外部荷载,提高结构安全性。为此,探究了不同环向位置、纵向间距下的泄水孔设置方案,对工程建设具有重要意义。
    方法 以广东省深圳市罗湖区的塘朗山高速铁路盾构隧道为案例,介绍了案例工程的概况,建立了案例工程的数值模型。将泄水孔环向布置点分为4个工况(拱顶拱底排水、拱肩排水、拱腰排水、拱脚排水),并与不排水工况进行对比,分析了泄水式管片在不同泄水孔位置下围岩渗流场、管片外水压力、泄水量的分布规律。随后选取5个纵向间距(10 m、8 m、6 m、4 m、2 m)工况,并与不排水工况进行对比,进一步研究不同泄水孔环向位置布置方案下围岩渗流场、管片外水压力、泄水量的分布规律。
    结果及结论 泄水孔位于拱脚时,围岩渗流场被扰动的范围最大,管片的最大外水压力最小,泄水量最大。泄水孔纵向间距大于8 m时,相邻泄水孔相互无明显影响,泄水效果无明显差异。随着纵向间距减小,围岩渗流场被扰动的程度逐渐加大,最大外水压力逐渐减小,纵向外水压力不均匀性逐渐降低。纵向间距为4 m时,泄水量达到最大。泄压效果最优工况为泄水孔位于拱脚且纵向间距取2 m工况。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective In high-speed railway shield tunnels under high water pressure, the segment structure is subjected to significant external loads. To reduce the bearing load on the segments, drainage holes can be installed to alleviate the water pressure. Rational placement of drainage holes helps minimize external loads on the segments and enhances the structural safety. Therefore, investigating the placement schemes of drainage holes at different circumferential positions and longitudinal spacings is of great importance for engineering construction.
    Method Taking the Tanglang Mountain High-speed Railway Shield Tunnel in Luohu District, Shenzhen City, Guangdong Province as a case study, the general overview of the project is introduced and a numerical model for the case study is established. Four working conditions are defined for the circumferential arrangement of drainage holes, i.e. drainage at the vault and invert, drainage at the arch shoulders, drainage at the arch waist, and drainage at the arch foot. These are compared with a no-drainage condition to analyze the distribution patterns of the surrounding rock seepage field, external water pressure on the segments, and drainage volume under different drainage hole positions. Subsequently, compared with the no-drainage condition, five longitudinal spacings (10 m, 8 m, 6 m, 4 m, and 2 m) are selected to further investigate the above-mentioned distribution patterns under different layout schemes for circumferential positions of drainage holes.
    Result & Conclusion When drainage holes are located at the arch foot, the disturbance range to the surrounding rock seepage field is the largest, the maximum external water pressure on the segments is the smallest, and the drainage volume is the largest. When the longitudinal spacing of drainage holes exceeds 8 m, adjacent drainage holes have no significant influence on each other, and there is no notable difference in the drainage effect. As the longitudinal spacing decreases, the disturbance to the surrounding rock seepage field gradually increases, the maximum external water pressure gradually decreases, and the non-uniformity of longitudinal external water pressure is progressively reduced. The maximum drainage volume is reached at a longitudinal spacing of 4 m. The optimal working condition for pressure relief effect is observed when drainage holes are located at the arch foot with a longitudinal spacing of 2 m.

     

/

返回文章
返回