面向城市轨道交通保护区的线网级无人机蛙跳策略巡检配置优化方案

Network-Level UAV Leapfrog Strategy Inspection Configuration Optimization Scheme for Urban Rail Transit Protection Zones

  • 摘要:
    目的 城市轨道交通控制保护区(以下简称“地保区”)传统无人机自动化巡检受限于“原址起降”模式,存在折返电量损耗大、机库配置数量多、建设与运维成本高昂等问题,因此有必要研究复杂城市环境下的无人机线网级巡检优化方案。
    方法 综合考虑城市空域限制、线路敷设方式及网络联通性,提出一种基于蛙跳策略的无人机巡检系统配置优化方法。结合济南轨道交通已全面投入运营线路的实际地理与业务环境,建立以最小化机库部署数量和最大化巡检覆盖率为目标的“机库选址-潮汐调度-航线规划”多目标联合优化数学模型,并将该优化模型前置应用于济南轨道交通线网级全局规划。
    结果及结论  济南轨道交通3号线先导段的实测数据表明:蛙跳策略将无人机单向连续巡检里程由传统的3.25 km拉长至6.50 km,且降落时电池荷电状态保有30%以上的安全冗余,跑通了“飞行-快充-接力”的控制闭环。线网级全局规划的仿真结果表明:通过拉伸单线站距与实施“换乘枢纽机库跨线共享”,全线网机库配置总数由传统独立规划的72台降至38台,在一定程度上解决了线网“机库建不起、没地建”的工程痛点。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective Conventional UAV (unmanned aerial vehicle) inspections in urban rail transit control protection zones are limited by the 'take-off and return-to-base' mode, presenting issues such as significant power loss during return trips, a large number of deployed hangars, and high construction and O&M (operation and maintenance) costs. Therefore, it is necessary to study a network-level UAV inspection optimization scheme in complex urban environments.
    Method Comprehensively considering urban airspace restrictions, line-laying methods, and network connectivity, a configuration optimization method for UAV inspection systems based on leapfrog strategy is proposed. In combination with the actual geographical and business environments of the fully operational lines of Jinan Rail Transit, a multi-objective joint optimization mathematical model for 'hangar siting–tidal scheduling–route planning' is established, aiming to minimize the number of deployed hangars and maximize inspection coverage. This optimization model is applied proactively to the network-level holistic planning of Jinan Rail Transit.
    Result & Conclusion  The measured data from the pilot section of Jinan Rail Transit Line 3 demonstrate that the leapfrog strategy extends the one-way continuous UAV inspection mileage from the conventional 3.25 km to 6.50 km, and maintains a safety redundancy of over 30% for the battery state of charge (SOC) upon landing, successfully running through the control closed loop of 'flight–fast charge–relay.' The simulation results of the network-level holistic planning show that by extending the single-line hangar spacing and implementing 'cross-line sharing of hangars at transfer hubs,' the total number of hangars deployed across the entire network is reduced from 72 under conventional independent planning to 38. To a certain extent, this solves the engineering pain points of 'unaffordable construction and lack of land' for hangars within the rail network.

     

/

返回文章
返回