塞尔维亚有轨电车轨道系统设计技术研究

王九州1李鑫2张志成1韩林凯1李正中3

Research on Tram Track System Design Technology in Serbia

WANG JiuzhouLI XinZHANG ZhichengHAN LinkaiLI Zhengzhong
  • 作者信息:
    1.天津市政工程设计研究总院有限公司, 300392, 天津
    2.中国电建市政建设集团有限公司, 300384, 天津
    3.天津市交通科学研究院, 300060, 天津
  • Affiliation:
    Tianjin Municipal Engineering Design & Research Institute, 300392, Tianjin, China
  • 关键词:
  • Key words:
  • DOI:
    10.16037/j.1007-869x.2023.07.019
  • 中图分类号/CLCN:
    U231+1∶U482.1
  • 栏目/Col:
    研究报告
摘要:
目的:为了促进我国有轨电车线路设计技术的持续进步,应长期关注和深入研究欧洲不同城市有轨电车线路在车辆、轨道及其他系统上的关键设计技术。方法:基于我国参与的塞尔维亚“贝尔格莱德市新萨瓦河大桥项目”咨询工作,对欧洲(塞尔维亚采用欧洲标准)和我国涉及有轨电车轨道专业的标准进行了对比,研读了项目的设计文件图纸和计算书,并结合实地调研、与塞尔维亚设计人员的走访交流等工作,从标准体系、钢轨选型、温度力计算及轨道结构等4个方面总结了我国与欧洲在有轨电车轨道设计标准和理念上的异同。结果及结论:我国和欧洲的有轨电车轨道专业方面标准条款的差异不大,但具体设计中仍有很多与我国应用的技术路线有很多不同之处,应对欧洲标准进行更为深入的研究。与欧洲标准相比,我国标准比较完整,许多计算参数可直接使用,设计效率更高,控制标准也更高。
Abstracts:
Objective: To promote the continuous progress of tram line design technology in China, longterm attention and indepth research on the key design technologies of tram lines in vehicles, tracks, and other systems in different European cities should be given. Method: Based on the consultancy work of the ′New Sava River Bridge Project in Belgrade′ with Chinese enterprises participation, a comparison is made between European (Serbia adopts European standards) and Chinese standards related to tram track discipline. The design documents, drawings, and calculation sheets of the project are studied, and combined with onsite investigation, visits and exchanges with Serbian designers, from four aspects of standard system, rail selection, temperature force calculation and track structure, the differences and similarities in the design standards and concepts of tram tracks between China and Europe are summarized. Result & Conclusion: There is not much difference in the standard terms of tram track between China and Europe, but there are still many specific design differences in comparison with the technical routes applied in China. Therefore, more indepth research should be carried out on European standards. By comparison, Chinese standards are relatively complete, with many calculation parameters to use directly, having higher design efficiency as well as higher level of control standards.
论文检索