辉绿岩侵入花岗岩地层条件下大跨度地铁车站暗挖施工方法比选
殷小亮
Comparative Selection of Largespan Metro Station Undergroundexcavated Construction Method under Diabase Intrusion into Granite Formation Condition
YIN Xiaoliang
-
作者信息:中铁二局第二工程有限公司， 610091， 成都
-
Affiliation:China Railway Second Bureau Second Engineering Co., Ltd., 610091, Chengdu, China
-
关键词:
-
Key words:
-
DOI:10.16037/j.1007-869x.2023.07.030
-
中图分类号/CLCN:U231.3
-
栏目/Col:施工技术
摘要:
目的：青岛地铁6号线华山一路站处于辉绿岩侵入花岗岩地层而形成的复杂异质地层中，不同施工方法下车站开挖力学响应、围岩变形与地面沉降差异较大，需要从中优选出最优的施工方法。方法：依托青岛地铁6号线华山一路站(该站为辉绿岩侵入花岗岩地层复杂异质地层)工程，对CD(中隔壁)法、CRD(交叉中隔壁)法、双侧壁导坑法和初支拱盖法4种施工方法进行了三维数值模拟分析，对比了各施工方法下地面沉降、隧道洞周围岩变形和车站塑性区的分布规律，进而优选出合理的施工方法。结果及结论：车站开挖后围岩产生非对称变形，辉绿岩一侧的地面沉降及围岩变形均大于花岗岩一侧，辉绿岩一侧的塑性区也大于花岗岩一侧；双侧壁导坑法和初支拱盖法在地面沉降及围岩变形上的控制效果较好；在变形程度和破坏区域发展方面，双侧壁导坑法和初支拱盖法优于CRD法，CRD法优于CD法，所以双侧壁导坑法和初支拱盖法控制变形的效果较好，数值分析后认为这2种施工方法均可行。初支拱盖法是最优施工方法。监测结果表明，初支拱盖法在控制围岩变形和地面沉降上效果良好。
Abstracts:
Objective: Qingdao Metro Line 6 Huashan 1st Road Station is in complex and heterogeneous stratum formed by diabase intrusion into granite formation, different construction methods adopted for the station excavation will cause distinct mechanical responses, surrounding rock deformation and land subsidence, thus the optimal construction method needs to be selected. Method:Based on the engineering project of the above station (located in the complex and heterogeneous stratum of diabase intrusion into granite formation), a 3D numerical simulation analysis is carried out on four construction methods, including CD (center diaphragm) method, CRD (cross diaphragm) method, doubleside heading method and primary support archcover method. The land subsidence, tunnel hole surrounding rock deformation and station plastic zone distribution due to different construction methods are compared and the optimal construction method is selected. Results & Conclusion: After station excavation, the surrounding rock exhibits asymmetric deformation, with greater land subsidence and surrounding rock deformation on the diabase side compared to the granite side; the doubleside heading method and primary support archcover method demonstrate better control over land subsidence and surrounding rock deformation; in the aspect of deformation and destruction area development, the doubleside heading method and primary support archcover method outperform the CRD method, and the CRD method outperforms the CD method. Therefore, the doubleside heading method and primary support archcover method are effective in controlling deformation, and both methods are deemed feasible based on numerical analysis. The primary support archcover method is considered the optimal construction method. Monitoring results indicate that the primary support archcover method effectively controls surrounding rock deformation and land subsidence.
- 上一篇: 高铁物流运输模式及其可行性
- 下一篇: 5G公专网支撑城市轨道交通“绿智融合”发展
过刊浏览
资料下载
友情链接