市域(郊)铁路和城际铁路的实名制乘车方案设计及适用性分析
张瀛丹1游雪松2汪健雄3刘卓华3
Design and Applicability Analysis of Real-name Train-riding Scheme for City (Suburban) and Intercity Railways
ZHANG Yingdan1YOU Xuesong2WANG Jian-xiong3LIU Zhuohua3
-
作者信息:1.北京经纬信息技术有限公司，100081，北京
2.中国国家铁路集团有限公司客运部，100161，北京
3.中国铁道科学研究院集团有限公司电子计算技术研究所，100081，北京
-
Affiliation:1.Beijing Jingwei Information Technologies Co., Ltd., 100081, Beijing, China
2.Ministry of passenger transport, China National Railway Group Co., Ltd., 100161, Beijing, China
3.Institute of Computing Technologies， China Academy of Railway Sciences Co., Ltd., 100081, Beijing, China
-
关键词:
-
Key words:
-
DOI:10.16037/j.1007-869x.2024.09.003
-
中图分类号/CLCN:U293.2∶U239.5
-
栏目/Col:百家论坛
摘要:
［目的］市域(郊)铁路、城际铁路的实名制乘车方案目前尚未有系统的研究成果，无法指导市域(郊)铁路、城际铁路实名制相关系统的落地及建设，这在一定程度上制约了四网融合的发展。［方法］分析了目前轨道交通行业实名制车票的现状，以及国家、地方、行业对实名制乘车的相关政策。阐述了市域(郊)铁路和城际铁路实行实名制的优缺点和必要性。首次提出了在市域(郊)铁路和城际铁路中采用弹性实名制乘车方案，将弹性实名制的2个方案(人、脸、票一致方案，票、证一致方案)同强实名制方案进行优缺点对比，对市域(郊)铁路和城际铁路弹性实名制方案的实施提出了相关建议。［结果及结论］市域(郊)铁路和城际铁路应具备弹性实名制的设置能力，可根据线路的实际情况和运营需求确定具体实施方案。
Abstracts:
［Objective］ At present, there are no systematic research results on the real-name train-riding scheme yet for city (suburban) and intercity railways. Therefore, the implementation and construction of such system has no guidelines, restricting the interconnected and integrated development of the four networks (main line railways, intercity railways, city/suburban railways and urban rail transit) to a certain extent. ［Method］ The current status of the real-name ticket system in rail transit industry, the national, local and industry policies related to real name train riding are analyzed. The advantages, disadvantages and necessity of implementing the above system in city (suburban) and intercity railways are expounded. For the first time, the scheme of using flexible real-name ticket system in city (suburban) and intercity railways is proposed, and two flexible real-name system schemes (the scheme of passenger′s person-face-ticket consistence, and the scheme of passenger′s ticket-ID consistence) and the strong real-name system scheme are compared in terms of their advantages and disadvantages. Relevant suggestions for the implementation of the flexible real-name system in city (suburban) and intercity railways are put forward. ［Result & Conclusion］ City (suburban) railway and intercity railway should have the ability to set up the flexible real-name system, and determine the specific implementation plans according to the actual situation and operational needs.
- 上一篇: 高铁物流运输模式及其可行性
- 下一篇: 碳纤维地铁列车的商用将开启轨道车辆用材的新时代
过刊浏览
资料下载
友情链接